More Expo '85 information
#1
Posted 13 March 2011 - 11:07 PM
http://www.worldsfai...o85/a-block.htm
I've been restoring a large group of photos from Expo '85 and will be expanding the rest of my Expo '85 coverage soon.
#2
Posted 14 March 2011 - 06:22 AM
#3
Posted 14 March 2011 - 06:39 AM
#4
Posted 14 March 2011 - 07:28 AM
I remember seeing HDTV for the first time in 1985, both at Expo '85 and at the Sony headquarters. It was priced so far out of reality that it was sort of comical, but you could see that it was something you would want. Happily like most things electronic they got the price down and the quality up. Do you know what the HDTV specs were back then?
Bill
#5
Posted 14 March 2011 - 05:15 PM
Wow, have things changed, huh, Wayne?
I remember seeing HDTV for the first time in 1985, both at Expo '85 and at the Sony headquarters. It was priced so far out of reality that it was sort of comical, but you could see that it was something you would want. Happily like most things electronic they got the price down and the quality up. Do you know what the HDTV specs were back then?
Bill
Original Hi-Vision was 1125 lines total, 1035 lines active. The original systems were analog, so the horizontal resolution was somewhat limited, but much better than any standard definition system. Also, the aspect ratio was 5:3 instead of 16:9, and the pixel spacing of the digital version was not "square" (i.e., different in vertical and horizontal directions) in an attempt to get the simplest down conversion to both American and European standard definition. NHK developed the "MUSE" system to squeeze the signal onto a limited bandwidth analog satellite, and eventually showed a 6 MHz MUSE system for broadcast - but the quality was much inferior to the digital systems that were eventually developed. Those crazy Americans in the computer industry insisted on "square pixels," and Sony and NHK agreed, giving the world the 1920x1080, interlaced, 30 fps, 16:9 pictures we have today. The computer guys, plus Zenith, AT&T, MIT and ABC also insisted on progressive scan, and they got it in the 1280x720, progressive, 60 fps format.
#6
Posted 14 March 2011 - 06:11 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














